Skip to main content

About your Search

20130115
20130123
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4
CSPAN
Jan 18, 2013 6:00am EST
by the slides, was energy slashed proposal. we went from kitty hawk to luna in 60 something years, and sideways almost completely the last 40. that's an enormous gap. was that a function of us going through live -- low-hanging fruit with energy star system -- with systems for energy, or was that a function of military budgeting, or is it more than that? so first question is, was information technology the real big mess? or is energy and/or propulsion after failure to do anything fair for the last 40 years also part of our miss and the reason here today? >> oh, well, certainly it's a great candidate, and you can see the exponential rise of it. and that happens for lots of areas like energy, transport. but these are saturated. here's some of the candidates. we have doubled -- up next to a, here's a flying car by the way, for those who care about flying cars. you can buy this. they came out this year. and it's really kind of fun i think. i mean, today's era car. it's not completely dead. people have largely not notice that we have increase agricultural productivity a great deal and that's not so m
CSPAN
Jan 16, 2013 7:30am EST
that energy companies will have to put people on the lowest tariffs. that is a record we can be proud of. >> steve basic. >> mr. speaker -- [inaudible] my constituency is enb during a hideous regulatory fast thanks to the health and safety executive and the european union. the british economy is very reliant on small and medium businesses far less able to cope with bad regulation particularly when it's badly administer inside the u.k. >> my honorable friend is absolutely right. businesses large and small are complaining about the burden of regulation. not just the burden of regular ration from europe -- regulation from europe, but more generally. and that is why we should be fighting in europe for a more flexible europe and a europe where we see regulations come off. but the view of the party opposite is sit back, do nothing and never listen to the british people or british business either. >> order! >> here on c-span2 we'll leave the british house of commons now as today move on to other legislative business. you've been watching prime minister's question time aired live wednesdays at 7
CSPAN
Jan 17, 2013 6:00am EST
of of reported impacts that we had seen. water resources, energy, wildfire. and one of the things you order in the last discussion and in this one that is the underappreciated aspect of the impacts of drought and air ridty, the loss of ecosystem sources as they support and supply tourism, recreation, clean water and clear air. we do not have any sense of what the costs of those multiple impacts are. we know a bit about the insured impacts from agriculture, but so, therefore, what needs to be considered? the indicators, as margaret is saying, about how people are economically impacted, but as critically how they're socially impacted. if we're to put plans into place, we have to and how do you know they're working? the indicators include the development of people's capacity to respond. not simply the number of plans, but what in those plans allows the inclusion of information. that's what we call tracking the outcomes. that's the kind of indicators. the combination, certainly, of the physical system, the social and economic, but also the capacity engaged for decision making. that's three aspe
CSPAN
Jan 15, 2013 6:00am EST
energy and anticipation on what you -- attention on what you admitted in your own testimony a terrible problem. i'm wondering how these experiments will be evaluated, how -- what the learnings will be shared, how the public will be informed of whether or not all these excellent inputs actually yield results and how soon. so i'm wondering what the plan for disseminating best practices if any of these things turn out to be if not the magic bullet, then part of the arsenal that becomes the way we combat sexual violence in the military. pardon the military allusion. >> we'll -- thank you for that question, ma'am. >> that's the first. >> one of our lines of effort is really one that you're really commenting and focusing on here, and that's the line and effort of assessment. and so there are, there are some things in the place here that allow us to -- we recognize we have to continually look at ourself. and what i've actually been sharing with, you know, by colleagues in the services and so forth is that we have to assess our programs with an eye towards taking the best practices and making
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4